April 2012 State of San Francisco Bay Area Real Estate Market

For those homeowners who have waited out the lull in San Francisco Bay Area Housing market, your patience is now being rewarded!

Mortgage rates inched up last week after the Fed signaled to investors that it won’t buy more bonds to provide further stimulus to the U.S.economy. The benchmark 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rose to 4.25%, compared to 4.23% the previous week and the low of 4.10% that we had at the end of February.  The Avg 30-Yr Fixed Conforming loan w/0 Pts is currently at around 3.75%. The Avg 30-Yr Fixed High Balance Conforming Loan w/0 Pts is currently at around 4.125%. The Avg 30-Yr Fixed Jumbo Loan w/0 Pts is at around 5%

Rates are expected to seesaw in coming weeks as the market enters a volatile period.

 

The continued low interest rates are a big reason for the all out Seller’s market that we are now seeing throughout the Bay Area!  It’s as if every buyer that was sitting on the fence has suddenly come off the fence this year and there isn’t nearly enough inventory available for the greatly expanded pool of qualified/interested buyers. Inventory has been shrinking consistently for the last 10 months.  Since May/2011, the residential (Class 1 and 2) property inventory for the Peninsula has dropped from 1,357 units to currently just 607 units. For the Upper South Bay/Lower Peninsula hub, over the same period, inventory has dropped from 863 units to 317 units currently. For the San Jose area over the same period, inventory has dropped from 2,405 units to 988 units currently.  These are staggering figures. The combination of extremely low inventory and a hugely expanded new pool of buyers has created a Seller’s market frenzy similar to what we saw in the years 2005 and 2000!

 

Another major reason for the sudden rush of Bay Area buyers is last year’s spike in Bay Area rental prices. For 2011,San FranciscoandSan Josesaw average rental rate increases of 5.9% and 4.9% respectively.  Such increases are one reason why industry analysts believe 2012 will be the first year since 2005 when the share of apartment renters that moves out to buy a house increases from the previous year.  Historically, the cost to rent an apartment has been about 10% lower than the after-tax cost of owning a home.  That rental discount began to fall in 2010 and disappeared entirely last year, according to analysts at Deutsche Bank who track housing costs. By the end of 2011, the bank’s research found that the cost to rent an apartment was about 15% “higher” than the cost to own a home.  Combine “this” factor with historically low interest rates and renewed consumer confidence and you have an explosive situation with way more buyers than available inventory.

 

The only thing that will limit the impending spike in Bay Area real estate values will be the appraisals obtained for financed purchases.  Most buyers now “have” to pay more than the appraisable value of the home they are bidding on in order to have any chance to win the bid.  In some cases, a low appraisal will give the buyer a chance to negotiate the price down before actually completing the purchase.  However, in most of the multiple offer situations going on right now, the Seller is able to get at least 1 (usually “more” than 1) of the bidding buyers to waive their appraisal contingency. That eliminates the possibility of negotiating the price down if the appraisal comes in low.  Also, cash buyers don’t typically have appraisal contingencies and there are plenty of cash buyers right now in the 750K and under market.

 

For those home owners who have waited out the lull in the Bay Area Housing market, your patience is now being rewarded.  We are now seeing a Seller’s market the likes of which we haven’t seen since 2005.  This should be the beginning of a major move back up in Bay Area home values.  Those who are in the market to buy now will need to understand that it’s highly competitive right now since there’s much more demand than supply. Serious buyers will need to be ready to look at properties within a day or 2 of coming on the market and (in order to be able to win the competition for the given property) must be willing to go much higher in their bids than what the comps say the property is worth.  Until the inventory goes back up significantly and/or interest rates go up significantly, this frenzied Seller’s market should continue and home prices will see a major spike up throughout this 2012 Buying season.

 

 

George Sudol is the Broker/Owner of Bay Area Realty Services, a successful San Francisco Bay Area residential Real Estate firm. He also owns and operates Bay Area Mortgage Alliance, a California residential mortgage lending brokerage.                              See more at www.ba-realtyservices.com , Email george@ba-realtyservices.com, or Call 650-242-4079

 

March 2012 State of the San Francisco Bay Area Real Estate Market

Mortgage rates continue to skirt all-time lows. The 30-year fixed mortgage rate averaged 3.87% for the end of this past week, down from 5% the previous year. That is the lowest in Freddie Mac’s survey data, which stretches back to 1971.

For primary residence purchases, the Avg 30-Yr fixed Conforming loan w/0 Pts is at 3.75% and the Avg 30-Yr fixed High Balance Conforming loan w/0 Pts is at 4%.

Turning to the latest Real Estate news, San Francisco Bay Area home sales outpaced listings and inventory went down for the 9th straight month since May/2011.  Residential property inventory continued its steady decline in February and is now down to its lowest levels in over 6 years.  San Francisco Bay Area home sales had risen in January to the highest level for the month of January in five years, boosted by lower prices, ultra-low mortgage rates, a modestly improved economy and a record level of investor purchases  The median price paid for all new and resale houses and condos sold in the Bay Area in January was $326,000. That was down 2.8% from a revised $335,500 in December, and down 3.6% from $338,000 in January 2011. January’s median was the lowest since April 2009, when it was $304,000. The median’s low point of the current real estate cycle was $290,000 in March 2009. The peak was $665,000 in June/July 2007

It’s clear that the “Average” home sale price has edged lower in some areas recently, but that’s merely a reflection of the fact that the low-mid price segment of properties are the hot sellers, not of any deterioration of individual property values. January’s San Francisco Bay Area median of just $326,000 is a reflection of how skewed the market has become toward distressed, lower-cost properties. The 800K and under market is hot right now as investors gobble up the low end (400K and under) REO’s and Short Sales and regular home buyers in the 500-800K mid-range are taking advantage of low interest rates, lower home prices, and a renewed perception of economic and job stability. The higher-end (1M+) sales have slowed in recent months as many struggle to qualify for Jumbo loans and others just sit tight.

Meanwhile, we’ll be watching to see how housing prices might be impacted by the government’s recently announced efforts to help homeowners refinance, or otherwise avoid foreclosure. The federal-state settlement with 5 major banks reportedly calls for billions to be spent in California to help certain underwater homeowners reduce their principal (through the HARP 2 refinance loan program) and avoid short sale or foreclosure.  What’s not clear is the extent to which these efforts will kick in during the first half of 2012, which could alter the course of some who are on the brink of foreclosure right now.
If the most recent San Francisco Bay Area inventory and buying activity trends are any indication, we are in for a better than expected 2012 for San Francisco Bay Area Home value recovery.

 

George Sudol is the Broker/Owner of Bay Area Realty Services, a successful San Francisco Bay Area residential Real Estate firm. He also owns and operates Bay Area Mortgage Alliance, a California residential mortgage lending brokerage. See more at www.ba-realtyservices.com , Email george@ba-realtyservices.com, or Call 650-242-4079

 

How Much Home Can I Afford (2012 Mortgage Lending)

Many consumers are shaking off the real estate market hangover and going back into buying mode in hopes of taking advantage of the lower interest rates and lower home prices which have been left in the wake.  As you re-enter the home buying realm in 2012, you will be wondering “how much of a house can I afford” and there are several things that you should know about today’s newly reformed lending environment.

 

1. If you’re buying a home for investment, conventional lenders now require 25% downpayment for investment property purchases.  If you want to purchase an investment property with a lower downpayment, you will need to seek a private lender (which will have a much higher interest rate than with conventional financing).

 

2. The market for 2nd loans dried up several years ago with the collapse of IndyMac and Countrywide.  2nd loans were used to finance all or part of the 20% downpayment required by conventional Primary lenders, allowing buyers to obtain a conventional Primary loan with little to no money down.  Now that the secondary mortgage market has gone away, you will need at least a 20% downpayment if you want a conventional loan.  Otherwise, you will have to go with an FHA loan.

 

The rate for FHA loans is the same as with Conventional loans, but you have to pay MI (Mortgage Insurance) with FHA loans when you put less than 20% down.

There are 2 layers of MI:

One is the initial (up front) MI fee of 1Pt (1% of the loan amount)

The other is the ongoing MI payment which amounts to 1.1%-1.15%/year (1.15%/year if you apply a purchase downpayment of between 3.5% and 5%, 1.1%/year if you apply a purchase downpayment of more than 5%, but still less than 20%).

The ongoing MI payment is spread out over the year as a monthly payment.

The good news is that there is enough of a rebate with FHA loans (obtained at the same rate as conventional ones) to cover the up front Mortgage Insurance.

 

3. There is big news on the FHA lending front regarding an increase in the cost of BOTH layers of MI. Starting April 1, 2012, the up front MI for FHA loans goes up from 1% to 1.75% of the loan amount. The annual (ongoing) MI fees change as well, climbing by 10 basis across the board (so 1.25%/year for 5% or less downpayment and 1.2%/year for great than 5% down, but less than 20%) and by an additional 25 basis points for loans between $625,500 and $729,750 (the FHA loan limit is up to $729,750 in high cost areas like Washington, DC, New York City, and many parts of California)

Let’s look at example.  Let’s say you purchase a home for $500,000 with an FHA loan with 5% down.  You will be left with a $475,000 loan.  In addition to your $2,268/month loan payment (based on 4% interest rate), you will have $495/month MI payments (based on 1.25%/year of the $475,000 loan amount, divided by 12 monthly payments)

 

4. If you earn money as an independent contractor (“1099 employee” from an income tax standpoint), all that the lenders care about is how much “taxable” income you have made. Also, they will count your “average” taxable income over the past 2 tax years.
For example, let’s say your gross income was $200,000 in 2011 and $150,000 in 2010.  In both tax tears, you claimed $75,000 in tax deductions (deductions for your business expenses).  That leaves you with $125,000 taxable income for 2011 and $75,000 taxable income for 2010.  The average is $100,000.  Your loan qualification will be based on $100,000/year ($8,333/month) income.  Of course, all of your debts (such as car payments, student loans, and/or mortgages against other homes you own) will subtract from that $8,333/month, leaving you with an amount known as your “expendable” monthly income.  Most lenders will not allow a loan with total monthly payments (including loan principal and interest, property taxes, insurance, and/or HOA dues) that would exceed 50% of your expendable monthly income. In other words, the maximum debt to income ratio is generally 50%.

 

5. You also should understand the following rules regarding buying a home again after the Short Sale or Foreclosure of a home you have owned before:
Short sale with FHA Loan: You can purchase right away with no mortgage default,

3 year wait if in default at the closing, Reduced wait if you have re-established good credit and can show extenuating circumstances
Short Sale with conventional (Fannie Mae) Loan: 2 year wait if you put 20 % down, 4 year wait if you put between 10% to 20% down, 7 year wait if you put less than 10% down, 2 year wait if you can show extenuating circumstances and put more than 10% down
Short Sale with conventional (Freddie Mac) Loan: 4 year wait before being able to get a loan, 2 year wait if you can show extenuating circumstances

Foreclosure with an FHA Loan: 3 year wait before being able to get a loan, Reduced wait if you can show extenuating circumstances and re-establishes good credit
Foreclosure with a conventional (Fannie Mae) Loan: 7 year wait from the completed foreclosure sale date, 3 year wait if you can show extenuating circumstances, Additional underwriting requirements apply for 4 years after a 3 year waiting period, 7 year wait for a 2nd home, cash out re-financing, or an investment property
Foreclosure with a conventional (Freddie Mac) Loan: 5 year wait from the completed foreclosure sale date, 3 year wait if you can show extenuating circumstances

** As a side note, a Deed In Lieu of foreclosure (an agreement with your lender to “hand over the keys” to them) follows the same guidelines as the foreclosure policy for FHA loans and for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans, the same as their short sale policy.

6. If you buy a lot (a piece of land) or a property that is in such bad condition that the value is only in the land, conventional lenders will only lend you 50% of the value.

In other words, you will have to put 50% down for a Lot or a “Tear-down”.

 

7. Even though you can obtain a conventional mortgage with as little as 20% down, you will pay .25Pt more for your mortgage if you put less than 25% down.  All conventional lenders will automatically add .25Pt cost to your loan if you put less than 25% down.

 

Now that you are educated about the basic rules of our current lending environment, you should now know the answer to “how much I can afford for a house” and whether or not you’re really in a position to obtain a loan for the kind of home you want.

If so, you should know that rates have hit historical lows over the past year and the rate right now for a conventional 30-Yr fixed mortgage (with 0 Pts) is around 3.75% for a Conforming loan amount (of $417,000 or less) and around 4% (with 0 Pts) for a High Balance Conforming loan amount (between $417,001 and $625,000).  The fed announced in January that they were going to do everything in their power to keep mortgage interest rates low for the next 2 years. So with eyes wide open, happy house hunting!

 

George Sudol  is the Broker/Owner of Bay Area Realty Services, a successful San Francisco Bay Area residential Real Estate firm. He also owns and operates Bay Area Mortgage Alliance, a California residential mortgage lending brokerage. Please feel free to contact George or one of his loan officers for a precise mortgage calculation to see exactly how much house you can afford at today’s rates.
See more at www.ba-realtyservices.com ,
Email george@ba-realtyservices.com,
or Call George at 650-242-4079

SF Bay Area Real Estate

 

The Illegal and Unsavory Practice of Referrals and Kickbacks in the Real Estate and Mortgage Industry

Illegal Mortgage and Real Estate Fees The one that bothers me a lot is the practice of paying referral fees to unlicensed people (friends, co-workers, family members, etc).  In most cases, this practice is illegal and for good reason.

As you know, buying a home and obtaining a mortgage is complicated and many consumers rely on real estate agents and mortgage brokers to help them through this process. Consumers trust their real estate agent or mortgage broker to assist them in getting the best and most cost effective settlement services available to meet their needs. Unfortunately, this does not always happen and consumers are often steered to higher priced settlement services.

RESPA (The Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act) is an act that was passed by congress in 1974. It was created because various companies associated with the buying and selling of real estate, such as lenders, real estate agents, construction companies and title insurance companies were often engaging in providing undisclosed kickbacks to each other, inflating the costs of real estate transactions and obscuring price competition by facilitating bait-and-switch tactics.

There are many examples of such prohibited practices, but the one that I am referring to is the following:

Real estate agents or mortgage brokers paying “finders fees” to friends and past customers for referring new business.

 

Other examples include:

  • Title companies, mortgage brokers, lenders offering real estate agents a free chance to win a contest or prize, such as trips, money, coupons and discount certificates.
  • Mortgage brokers, lenders, title companies offering to assist real estate agents promote themselves or their property listings, by providing such things as postcards, virtual tours, and marketing materials.
  • Mortgage brokers, lenders, title companies offering to pay or defray any costs that real estate brokers or agents would otherwise have to incur, such as providing continuing education or paying disproportionate costs for joint advertising.
  • Mortgage brokers, lenders, title companies providing “thank you” gifts to real estate agents for referring business.
  • Mortgage brokers or lenders paying real estate brokers or agents a commission for referring a loan.

 

Section 8(a) of RESPA prohibits giving and receiving any fee, kickback, or thing of value for the referral of settlement service business. A violation of RESPA carries the potential for up to a year in jail and a $10,000.00 fine for each involved party.
The highly regarded real estate law treatise by Miller & Starr, California Real Estate, citing RESPA, concludes, “The Act does not prohibit a cooperative brokerage and referral agreement between real estate brokers where one broker pays a referral fee to another broker. However, a broker cannot pay any consideration to an unlicensed finder even though such payment may be legal under state law.”

Also under California law, a broker can pay compensation only to another broker or to a duly licensed salesperson through the employing broker. Even if someone is otherwise entitled to a commission split, if they are unlicensed at the time the compensation is earned it is illegal to compensate that person. It is also illegal for a broker to employ or compensate an unlicensed person for acts that require a license.

 

I believe there are 2 key reasons for this law:

  1. Such referral fees obscure price competition. The unlicensed person has monetary incentive to refer any real estate professional to any client, regardless of what he/she really thinks of that professional’s ability to serve that person who needs the given real estate or mortgage service. In other words, it’s likely that they are basically referring people to that professional for the money that he/she has to gain (for the referral), rather than the ability or quality of the professional in question.  Also, unlicensed people generally lack the ability to judge who is a “good” or “appropriate” real estate professional for a given client since they themselves are not a professional in the industry.
  2. Such referral fees inflate the costs of real estate transactions and services. Since the Realtor or loan person knows that he/she would have to pay the referring person part of the commission he/she would be earning for the service, he/she may charge the client a higher amount for the service to make up for the amount that needs to be paid to the referring person.

 

While there are certain exceptions to the law (regarding unlicensed people receiving referral fees), I believe that it would be unwise to attempt to circumvent the law through these exceptions. As a Real Estate or Mortgage Professional, rather than even give the hint of doing something illegal, it would be better for you to protect your license that you have worked hard for, and not cross the line.  It’s not worth the risk!  Remember, it’s both an unsavory and an illegal practice and RESPA violations carry the potential for up to a year in jail and a $10,000.00 fine for each involved party. It’s also best for the parties involved (in the given transaction) to keep the unlicensed/non-professional referring person completely uninvolved in the transaction.  By receiving a referral fee, that person would inherently become involved in the transaction (and they don’t “belong” in it).

There have been many RESPA reforms to Real Estate and Mortgage Lending laws over the past several years.  These reforms were necessary to prevent Real Estate and Mortgage professionals from taking advantage of consumers to the extent that a real estate bubble can be created.  Illegal kick-backs and referrals are at or near the top of the list of the reforms.

Moving forward, the elimination of illegal referral and kick-back fees will help to create a more transparent, professional, and even playing field among real estate professionals in the industry. Real estate professionals and consumers alike need to be aware of both the laws against such practices and the reasons why these laws exist.

 

George Sudol  is the Broker/Owner of Bay Area Realty Services, a successful San Francisco Bay Area residential Real Estate firm. He also owns and operates Bay Area Mortgage Alliance, a California residential mortgage lending brokerage. See more at www.ba-realtyservices.com , Email george@ba-realtyservices.com, or Call 650-242-4079

 

 

Major Questions to Ask Yourself Before Deciding to Buy a Home

Whether you’re currently in the process of buying a home or thinking about it for the future, this will be a very major commitment in your life and there are some key things to consider before making that purchase.

Here are some important questions you should ask yourself:

Am I likely to want to own it long term?

The most important thing to ask yourself before buying any property is whether you are likely to own it for a long time, such as 5 years or more. People buy property in hopes of increasing wealth and five years is about the break-even point for earning appreciation in value above the buying and selling transaction costs. Considering the uncertainty of the short term direction of homes values, if you don’t plan on holding the property for “at least” 3 years and you aren’t purchasing it to become a rental property, it probably isn’t worth considering.  Buying and selling a home quickly will often leave you worse off financially than if you just held off on becoming a homeowner and rented instead.

Do I truly love the home I want to buy?

It’s extremely important to consider whether you truly love the property you’re considering.  Real Estate should typically be held for the long term and your enjoyment of a property should perpetuate a happy and enduring ownership period. So don’t buy a property on impulse. Make sure that you truly do love it. Don’t buy a home just for the “sake” of “buying” because you’re envious of others who own a home or others who tell you it’s a good idea. Buy what you want and after careful consideration, when you are truly ready, buy a home that you will feel proud to own for many years to come.

Can I really afford it?

The cost of owning/maintaining a home is typically more than anyone anticipates going into it. You should to make sure that you’re comfortable with the mortgage payments, even if your lender tells you that you qualify for the given loan and purchase price. Lenders don’t take into account many day-today expenses like health care, child care, expensive lifestyles and habits, etc. Make sure that you can comfortably afford your home payments, still pay your other bills and expenses, and also still have a little left to save for retirement. Also, if you’re unsure of your long term employment situation for any reason, wait until your job situation is stable.

Is the home in good condition?

Be aware that fixer homes often don’t sell at enough of a discount to compensate for all the work that needs to be done. The cost of good quality construction and rehabilitation work can be astronomical and unless you are yourself a contractor, it typically will cost much more than you anticipate. You might want to leave the “needs TLC” or “fixer-uppers” property listings for the contractors out there and instead buy something in at least “Average” and “Livable” condition in order to avoid getting swept up in a disastrous rehab project.

How much do you know about the neighborhood?

Make sure that you do adequate research, look at enough properties, get a feel for the neighborhoods, and learn about property ownership with your Realtor before you made an offer. If you recently moved into town or don’t know the particular area, it might be a good idea to rent for a while and seek out the community that would be the most perfect for you within your financial means. This will be the biggest investment you ever make. You need to educate yourself in order to minimize the risk of the investment going wrong.

While there‘s no such thing as “risk-free” real estate, it would be wise to consider the questions above. Careful consideration of these key questions will increase your chances of experiencing a joyous, long-term property ownership experience. 

George Sudol  is the Broker/Owner of Bay Area Realty Services, a successful San Francisco Bay Area residential Real Estate firm. He also owns and operates Bay Area Mortgage Alliance, a California residential mortgage lending brokerage. See more at www.ba-realtyservices.com , Email george@ba-realtyservices.com, or Call 650-242-4079

 

SF Bay Area Real Estate